CaliforniaSchoolsGeorge Washington Carver Middle

George Washington Carver Middle

PublicRegular
Los Angeles, California · Los Angeles Unified
Teachers36.0FTE
Ratio19.5:1students per teacher
Students703enrolled
SCHOOL SNAPSHOT
Students703
Grade Span6–8
Student:Teacher19.5:1
Free/Reduced Lunch97%
Title INo
SectorPublic
Visit school website →
Student : Teacher
16.3:1
16.4%vs prior yrUS avg 15.4:1
Teacher FTE
39
8.3%vs prior yr
Enrollment
635
9.7%vs prior yr
Years of Data
5
2020–2024
Counselors
1:355
3.7%vs prior yrASCA max 1:250
Nurses
1:1,420
93%vs prior yrNASN max 1:750
Psychologists
1:1,420
28.7%vs prior yrNASP max 1:500
Social Workers
1:710
SSWAA max 1:250
Trends & 5-year history below

Pupil : Teacher Ratio — 5-Year Trend

14.8:116.4:118.0:119.7:121.3:122.9:12020202120222023202422.2:122.3:120.9:119.5:116.3:1This schoolUS public-school avg

Enrollment & Teacher FTE

629647665682700718303234363840202020212022202320247106917127036353231343639EnrollmentTeacher FTE

Year-by-year workforce

Metric20202021202220232024Nat Avg
Enrollment710691712703635
Teacher FTE3231343639
Pupil : Teacher ratio22.2:122.3:120.9:119.5:116.3:115.4:1

What These Numbers Mean

Teacher FTE

Full-Time Equivalent counts part-time teachers proportionally. One full-time teacher = 1.0 FTE; two half-time teachers also = 1.0 FTE. This is the standard federal reporting unit.

Pupil : Teacher ratio

NCES-reported ratio divides total enrollment by teacher FTE. It is NOT the same as average class size — schools with specialists, coaches, and resource teachers will show lower ratios than typical class sizes.

How to read the trend

A falling pupil:teacher ratio (line going down) means more staffing per student — generally a positive signal. A rising line can indicate budget pressure or fast enrollment growth outpacing hiring. Always compare to the US average (dashed grey).

Historical data spans 20202024 from NCES CCD.

Student Support & Wellbeing

Non-teaching staff who support student mental health, physical health, and behavioural needs. Lower pupil-to-staff ratios mean more one-on-one access.

Counselors & Social Workers — staff to pupils (recommended 1:250)

1:01:1531:3071:4601:6131:7672015201720201:2461:3691:3551:710Counselor : PupilsSocial Worker : PupilsRecommended 1:250

Nurses & Psychologists — staff to pupils

1:01:4301:8601:1,2911:1,7211:2,1512015201720201:3691:7371:1,4201:3691:1,9921:1,420Nurse : PupilsNASN 1:750Psychologist : PupilsNASP 1:500

Support staffing & ratios — year by year

Metric201520172020Nat Avg
Counselors (FTE)322
Nurses (FTE)210.5
Psychologists (FTE)20.40.5
Social Workers (FTE)001
Counselor : Pupils1:2461:3691:3551:250
Nurse : Pupils1:3691:7371:1,4201:750
Psychologist : Pupils1:3691:1,9921:1,4201:500
Social Worker : Pupils1:7101:250

Why these ratios matter

Counselors (ASCA 250:1)

School counselors support academic planning, college & career readiness, and social-emotional wellbeing. The American School Counselor Association recommends no more than 250 students per counselor.

Nurses (NASN 750:1)

School nurses manage chronic conditions, medications, immunisations, and emergencies. The National Association of School Nurses recommends at least 1 full-time nurse per 750 students (more for high-need populations).

Psychologists (NASP 500:1)

School psychologists assess learning & behavioural needs, run mental-health interventions, and coordinate special-education services. NASP recommends 500:1 or lower.

Social workers (SSWAA 250:1)

School social workers bridge home-school relationships, address attendance & trauma, and connect families to community resources. SSWAA recommends 250:1.

Source: US Dept of Education CRDC (20152020) — Civil Rights Data Collection.